Skip to the main content
What changed

Aid is becoming investment. Investment expects a return.

Most people in the sector know about the cuts. The part that gets less attention is what happened to the money that stayed. It did not disappear. It got fussier. Fewer deals, each one bigger, and local money matters more than it did five years ago.

That is not a funding problem. It is a commercial one, and commercial problems can be solved.

Funders have started behaving like investors. Programmes are now asked to report investment readiness, commercial finance accessed and capital leveraged. These are questions about the businesses they work with, not about the intervention. Most only discover they cannot answer them near the end.

28%

the top of the range bilateral aid to sub-Saharan Africa was projected to fall by in 2025

OECD, Cuts in Official Development Assistance, June 2025

11

donor countries with further cuts announced to 2027, together nearly three quarters of all aid

OECD, Cuts in Official Development Assistance, June 2025

$65m

the median blended finance deal now, up from 38m

Convergence, State of Blended Finance 2025

3

ex-post evaluations among 72 market systems documents reviewed in 2024

BEAM Evidence Review, September 2024

What I do

  1. 1

    Designing the intervention

    Is there a market for this, and in which months do those customers actually hold cash?

    Most interventions are priced and timed on an assumption. I find out what the people you want to reach actually earn and spend across a year, including which months they are in surplus, which months they are not, and what they stop buying first when money is short. That tells you what can be sold, at what price, and in which season.

    A cash calendar for the target population, a real market size, and the portion of it reachable through the traders and agents already operating.

  2. 2

    Choosing partners

    Which businesses can carry this commercially, rather than which ones apply?

    Selection usually tests whether a business is willing and whether it is able. Neither of those asks whether the business itself is solvent. I build a financial picture of every candidate from its own records, covering margin, cash cycle and whether it covers its costs without you, and rank them on that.

    Every candidate assessed from its own records, ranked, with selection criteria you can defend to your funder.

  3. 3

    Working with partners

    How does this business get to paying its own way?

    We work through what the business sells, to whom, at what price and at what cost, until the numbers close. Then we test it on a real paying customer rather than a pilot nobody pays for. Their finance people build the model with me, so it is theirs to run when I go.

    A financial model built with the partner, a priced product or service, and a tested route to a real paying customer.

  4. 4

    Taking partners to finance

    What does a lender actually need to see?

    Businesses that are ready get prepared the way a lender expects, with the accounts, the exposure, what the money would do and how it comes back. Then I introduce them to institutions I work with. I do not promise anyone receives finance. That decision belongs to the lender.

    An investment case per business, and introductions. The lending decision belongs to the lender.

  5. 5

    Reporting and closing

    Can we show what happened, and did it last?

    Performance comes from each business's own records rather than from a survey, so what you report is verified rather than claimed. It maps to the indicators already in your logframe, so it goes into your reporting rather than sitting beside it.

    Verified performance per business, mapped to the indicators in your logframe.

  6. 6

    After the programme

    Does anything continue once you have gone?

    The businesses keep reporting for two years after you close. If they stop, that is reported as a finding rather than hidden. It is the only way anyone can say what lasted. Across seventy-two market systems documents reviewed in 2024, there were three ex-post evaluations.

    The same businesses, the same figures, still reporting for two years after close.

Evidence

What the work found.

Fifteen engagements. Some of this contradicts what the sector tells itself, and it is written plainly because that is how it turned up.

  • 1

    Implementation learning

    Training is not transformation

    Training alone does not improve produce quality. The market has to reward quality before quality appears. That changes what a capability budget should be buying.

  • 2

    Systemic insight

    Inclusion without income is still exclusion

    A study tracing where the money actually lands in a value chain, and how little of it reaches the people a programme counted as included.

  • 3

    Transition

    A donor programme that became a business

    A regional seed and markets programme moved from donor funded to a private company across three Southern African countries, with clear customers and its own plan.

3,000+

micro and small enterprises financed in Kano, Nigeria, with repayment sustained above 98%

176,281

producers reached against a target of 76,998 (MADE, Nigeria)

£10.5m

net additional income against a £3.1m target (MADE, Nigeria)

12

private companies partnered, leveraging £500,000+ into the cassava value chain

200%+

production growth in leather clusters, Kano

25

years of work across seven African countries

“I worked with Al-Habib for a few years when he was the Market Systems Adviser for our BIF programme in Nigeria. Al-Habib has extensive market systems expertise and knows Nigeria and the various stakeholders involved in the agricultural supply chains in Nigeria very well. I would highly recommend Al-Habib for any market systems, value chain analysis and economic development programmes across Africa.”

Cristina Bortes

Director, PwC Consulting

What you will be able to report

  • Investment readiness by stage, for each business and across the portfolio.

  • Commercial finance accessed and capital leveraged, with amounts and sources.

  • Adoption outside your partner set, with businesses copying the model without a grant.

  • Partner survival and performance at three, six, twelve and twenty-four months after close.

Take something with you

Three questions worth answering

  1. 1

    Which of your partner businesses are solvent right now?

  2. 2

    Which will still be trading two years after you leave?

  3. 3

    What would it take to make the rest investable?

Viable by Design

Every Wednesday. One idea. Unsubscribe whenever.

Viable by Design

The longer edition, from here rather than LinkedIn. Every Wednesday. One idea about what makes the businesses programmes back actually work.

1145 people read it on LinkedIn.

Habib Onifade

Assess the businesses. Fix the ones worth fixing. Take the ready ones to finance. Prove what lasted.

What I do

Explore

Grant to Commercial Viability Canvas. The Canvas Coach. habibonifade.com

© 2026 Habib Onifade